Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9560 PCIe and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1455MHz vs 1237MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9560 PCIe
5.7 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +56%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
Embedded
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1237 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2304
Shading Units
3072
144
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.58 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
178.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
5.700 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
5.700 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
356.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy