Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Intel UHD Graphics 617

AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Intel UHD Graphics 617

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 617 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1400MHz vs 1050MHz)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 320SP +122%
0.896 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 617
0.403 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Nov 2018
Renoir
Generation
HD Graphics-T
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

400 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
192
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
3
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.150 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
806.4 GFLOPS
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
403.2 GFLOPS
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Renoir
GPU Name
Amber Lake GT2
-
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
156 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

15W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy