Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT +5084%
19.91 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
220W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Navi 48
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
Unknown
420 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy