Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +3196%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
175W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Vega 10
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy