ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 141GB VRAM H200 SXM 141 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (215W vs 700W)
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1980MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
16576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
H200 SXM 141 GB
+13956%
66.91 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2024
Radeon R600
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
512bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
320
Shading Units
16896
16
TMUs
528
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
267.6 TFLOPS
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.91 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.45 TFLOPS
Board Design
215W
TDP
700W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GH100
R600 XT
(215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
80 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
