Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 240W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
-
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
RV380
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

240W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy