Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs AMD FirePro W4100

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 240W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
0.476 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100 +35%
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
8
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cape Verde
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

240W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy