Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 3830 vs ATI FirePro V4900

ATI Radeon HD 3830 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 3830 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 26.50GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 3830
0.428 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900 +79%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2008
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
26.50GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
480
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
10.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
427.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
85.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Turks
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy