Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1046MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.2GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
1304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM +5758%
2.812 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Nov 2016
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
993 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1046 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1650 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
211.2GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1344
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.29 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.812 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
117.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
170W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GK104
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy