Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 230W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
1496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 770 +6843%
3.333 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
May 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.72 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.333 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
138.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GK104
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
GK104-425-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy