Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +16966%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Fiji
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy