ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 4350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4350
0.096 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
+1200%
1.248 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon HD 4350
+196%
2773
Radeon Pro WX 2100
934
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon R700
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV710
GPU Name
Lexa
RV710
(215-0725016)
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
