Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4810 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

ATI Radeon HD 4810 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4810 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4810
0.8 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1400%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Feb 2024
Radeon R700
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
640
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
800.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
AD107
RV770 CE (215-0669093)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy