Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4860 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

ATI Radeon HD 4860 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4860 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4860
0.896 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1239%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2009
Release Date
Feb 2024
Radeon R700
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
640
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
179.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV790
GPU Name
AD107
RV790 GT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.959 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
282 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy