Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4890 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

ATI Radeon HD 4890 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4890 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4890 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.8GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4890
1.36 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +34%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
975 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.8GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
34.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1360 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
272.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV790
GPU Name
GM206
RV790 XT (215-0758016)
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.959 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
282 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy