Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 5830 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

ATI Radeon HD 5830 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5830 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 5830 's Advantages
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 5830
1.792 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +768%
15.56 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Unknown
Evergreen
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1120
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
44.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
358.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Cypress LE (215-0735047)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
22 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net