Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 5830 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

ATI Radeon HD 5830 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5830 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 5830 's Advantages
96 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 5830
1.792 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +5%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Feb 2014
Evergreen
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1120
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
44.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.792 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
358.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cypress LE (215-0735047)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy