Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon HD 6750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6750 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6750 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
504 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (86W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6750 +88%
1.008 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Nov 2008
Northern Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

9
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
720
Shading Units
216
36
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1008 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

86W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
GT200B
Juniper LE (215-0754009)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy