CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
VS
AMD Radeon HD 6950
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6950
2.253 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
+186%
6.451 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6950
VS
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2020
Northern Islands
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
22
Compute Units
-
1408
Shading Units
1920
88
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
70.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
563.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cayman
GPU Name
TU104
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
GPU Variant
TU104-150-KC-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Board Design
200W
TDP
160W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
3
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
4
AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
5
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
6
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
7
AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
8
AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
9
AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM
10
AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy