Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6950
2.253 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +461%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Unknown
Northern Islands
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
70.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
563.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
175W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Vega 10
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy