Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA T400

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +162%
2.867 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2021
Southern Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU117
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy