Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
1.229 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +309%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Feb 2021
Southern Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
1408
48
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
1229 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
307.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU116
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy