Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 8350 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 8350 OEM
0.104 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295 +473%
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
Sea Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
667 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
80
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
5.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
104.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

19W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy