AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
+888%
22.63 TFLOPS
GRID K2
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
May 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
6656
Shading Units
1536
416
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK104
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
