Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
6208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +2101%
22.63 TFLOPS
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Dec 2010
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
6656
Shading Units
448
416
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
204W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GF100
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy