AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
More VRAM (64GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 322.3GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (3230MHz vs 1700MHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
22.63 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50
+16%
26.46 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
May 2025
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Navi IV
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
2220 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
3230 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
322.3GB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
6656
Shading Units
2048
416
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.7 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
413.4 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.92 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.46 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
826.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
Navi 44
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
Navi 44 XT
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
4 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
