Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1700MHz vs 1627MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +239%
22.63 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
6656
Shading Units
2048
416
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
60W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA107S
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy