Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI25 +42279%
12.29 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Oct 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
852 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
436.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
21W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
G86
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy