Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI25 +822%
12.29 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
852 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
384bit
436.2GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GF110
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
3 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy