AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1700MHz vs 1627MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+618%
47.87 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
14080
Shading Units
2048
880
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
60W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA107S
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
