Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
12544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300 +1991%
47.87 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
1536
880
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
32
880
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

600W
TDP
225W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy