AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300
+5%
47.87 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Nov 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM3
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
220
Compute Units
208
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
13312
880
TMUs
832
0
ROPs
0
880
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
500W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
153 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A
