AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 106% (2100MHz vs 1019MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
17920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+2510%
81.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690
3.13 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
1536
1216
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
32
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
300W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
