AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2100MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (288GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
18688 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 1000W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+2940%
81.72 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2024
Release Date
Oct 2022
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
288GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
768
1216
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
1216
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
2553.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
1000W
TDP
30W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
153 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
