Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +2433%
81.72 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
1792
1216
TMUs
112
0
ROPs
32
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
225W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy