Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
18656 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +8072%
81.72 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
800
1216
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
16
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
150W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy