Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
19440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +181500%
81.72 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
19456
Shading Units
16
1216
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

750W
TDP
50W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
G96C
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy