Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
19360 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +26176%
81.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630
0.311 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
May 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
19456
Shading Units
96
1216
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
4
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.240 GPixel/s
2553.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
311.0 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
65W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net