Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
19264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +17032%
81.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
19456
Shading Units
192
1216
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
28
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
182W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
153 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy