Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
19376 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +78476%
81.72 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6290
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2011
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
80
1216
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

750W
TDP
19W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy