Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.28GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (937MHz vs 907MHz)
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 460 +54%
1.858 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Feb 2020
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
747 MHz
907 MHz
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
5
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
GP107
Baffin XT
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy