Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5500 XT and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1757MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5500 XT +765%
5.398 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1187 MHz
Base Clock
-
1757 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
480
96
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

56.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
168.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
10.80 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.398 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
337.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

125W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 14 PRO XL
GPU Variant
Turks GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy