Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5500 XT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1757MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5500 XT +907%
5.398 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1187 MHz
Base Clock
-
1757 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1536
Shading Units
216
96
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

56.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
168.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
10.80 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.398 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
337.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 14 PRO XL
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy