Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro 555 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 81.60GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 555
1.306 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +584%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1275 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
81.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
40.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
1306 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
81.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
AD107
Polaris 21 PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy