Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1499MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5700 XT +1331%
7.675 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1243 MHz
Base Clock
-
1499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2560
Shading Units
216
160
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

95.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
239.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
15.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.675 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
479.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 10 XTA
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy