Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M

AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 315M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (217.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 575 +11410%
4.489 TFLOPS
GeForce 315M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2011
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1695 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
217.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

35.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
140.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
4.489 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.489 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.78 GFLOPS
280.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
14W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
GT218
Polaris 20 XL (215-0910052)
GPU Variant
N11M-GE
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy