Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 217.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 575
4.489 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile +8%
4.884 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2019
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1455 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1695 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
217.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

35.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.32 GPixel/s
140.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
152.6 GTexel/s
4.489 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.769 TFLOPS
4.489 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.884 TFLOPS
280.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
TU116
Polaris 20 XL (215-0910052)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy