Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (217.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Boost Clock825MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 575 +609%
4.489 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1695 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
217.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

35.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
140.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
4.489 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.489 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
280.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
Opal
Polaris 20 XL (215-0910052)
GPU Variant
Opal XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy