Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (235W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +13%
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2816
144
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
235W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Hawaii
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy