Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +1280%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Dec 2009
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2304
Shading Units
192
144
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GT200B
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy